Five things we learnt in employment law this week (31 March)

Editor

31st March 2017
Five things we learnt in employment law this week
Companies in the gig economy are free-riding on the welfare state, says a new report by the Work and Pensions Committee.
  1. An Employment Tribunal has held that an Excel Cycle courier is a worker.  This was the second of four employment status cases in the Employment Tribunal against courier companies (Boxer v Excel Group Services Ltd).
Five things we learnt in employment law (24 March)
James Rhodes, partner at DAC Beachcroft LLP.

2. The Court of Appeal has held that an Employment Tribunal cannot reject an employer’s justification defence in an indirection discrimination claim on the basis that the employer should have used a different aim with a less discriminatory impact (Harrod v West Midlands Police).

3. The Employment Appeal Tribunal has determined that an employer’s incompetent handling of a grievance is not sufficient for an Employment Tribunal to make findings of discrimination and victimisation against the employer (Kent Police v Bowler).

4. The Home Office has published changes to the Immigration Rules which are particularly relevant for sponsors of Tier 2 migrants.  These changes will come into force from 6 April 2017.

5. In case you missed it (!), the Government has triggered Article 50 and published its Great Repeal Bill white paper in which it was confirmed that the entire body of EU law (including CJEU case law) will be transposed into UK law on Brexit Day (assumed, at this stage, to be 29 March 2019).

EmploymentSolicitor.com

We don’t use AI to replace lawyers. We value their experience, and judgment. But some routine legal services can be delivered faster, and better, with AI built into the legal process. Always a ‘human’ senior employment lawyer in the loop, but with routine elements sped up using AI.