Five things we learnt in employment law this week (16 June)

James Rhodes

16th June 2016
Five things we learnt in employment law this week
James Rhodes
James Rhodes – DAC Beachcroft.
  1. The disclosure of an acquittal on a rape charge in a criminal records check did not infringe a job applicant’s human rights (R v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police).

2. A tribunal cannot find that a dismissal was procedurally unfair without first establishing what procedure the employer ought to have followed (Express Medicals v O’Donnell).

3. In a service-provision TUPE case, a tribunal must only consider the position immediately before the would-be transfer regardless of whether or not the relevant grouping of staff may have been organised differently in the past (Amaryllis Ltd v MacLeod).

4. A tribunal may order an employee to be reinstated but with the same restricted duties which applied before the dismissal (McBride v Scottish Police Authority).

5. A Police Constable in North Yorkshire has been dismissed for wearing an “I love weed” woolly hat on duty.

James Rhodes is an employment partner at DAC Beachcroft LLP.

EmploymentSolicitor.com

We don’t use AI to replace lawyers. We value their experience, and judgment. But some routine legal services can be delivered faster, and better, with AI built into the legal process. Always a ‘human’ senior employment lawyer in the loop, but with routine elements sped up using AI.