Five things we learnt in Employment Law this week (28 July)

Editor

29th July 2017
Five things we learnt in employment law this week
five-things-learnt-employment-law
  1. In a landmark ruling this week, the Supreme Court has held that the current fee regime in place prior to lodging a Tribunal claim, which was introduced in 2013, is unlawful (R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor).
Five-things- learnt-employment-law
James Rhodes, Partner at DAC Beachcroft LLP.

2. A new consultation statement has been issued seeking views on increasing the bands for damages for injury to feelings and psychiatric injury as follows: lower band (£1,000 – £8,000), middle band (£8,000 – £25,000) and upper band (£25,000 to £42,000).

3. A new bill has been introduced which seeks to ensure that grieving parents who are employed receive paid leave in order to grieve.

4. A recent study has shown that many workers value flexible working over a pay rise. Of those studied, 42% of employees who don’t work flexibly said that they are under excessive pressure every day or more than once a week, compared to the 29% who work flexibly.

5. A job advert for a London bar has caused outrage for requesting that only “extremely attractive staff” should apply.  There was a further requirement that the individual should have a “fun, lively attitude” and “be comfortable wearing black heels” for full time waitressing.

EmploymentSolicitor.com

We don’t use AI to replace lawyers. We value their experience, and judgment. But some routine legal services can be delivered faster, and better, with AI built into the legal process. Always a ‘human’ senior employment lawyer in the loop, but with routine elements sped up using AI.