Five things we learnt in employment law this week (18 February 2020)

James Rhodes

18th February 2020
Five things we learnt in employment law this week
employment law five things 3 June 2019
James Rhodes, Partner at DAC Beachcroft LLP.

1. A one-off act can amount to a ‘provision, criterion or practice’ provided that it was reasonable to conclude that it would be repeated in the future (Ishola v Transport for London, Court of Appeal).

2. A period of historic illegality in the performance of an employment contract would not prevent an employee from enforcing it once the illegality had been cured (Robinson v Hiis Highness Sheikh Khalid Bin Sqar Al Qasimi, EAT).

3. A Tribunal may permit a disabled party to record proceedings if it was necessary to alleviate any disadvantaged caused by the party’s disability (Heal v The Chancellor, Master and Scholars of the University of Oxford, EAT).

4. In assessing the reasonableness of a decision to dismiss, a Tribunal can take account of facts known to the employer even if the dismissing officer does not have actual knowledge of them. (Uddin v London Borough of Ealing, EAT).

5. A recent study has found that young people attract future employers during recruitment by adding skills such as ‘proficient on social media’ on to their CV . Traditional skills are outdated and employers are looking for “youthful” skills to bring to their companies.

EmploymentSolicitor.com

We don’t use AI to replace lawyers. We value their experience, and judgment. But some routine legal services can be delivered faster, and better, with AI built into the legal process. Always a ‘human’ senior employment lawyer in the loop, but with routine elements sped up using AI.

1 thought on “Five things we learnt in employment law this week (18 February 2020)”

  1. With regard to Point 5 on Youthful Skills – this certainly sounds quite ageist. If traditional skills are in decline then there will be some impact on many sectors of the economy.

Comments are closed.